Ryan Dunn's confusing death?

bambam_051

Ryan Dunn's death and the details surrounding it have been so confusing to me. Some people are saying it is a hoax, some people are saying it is real. I honestly don't know what to believe because some stuff is weird.
1. When he crashed, how did the police identify him so fast? Wouldn't they need a picture of what he looked like to compare the facial hair and tattoos to the body?
2. How did they even identify him through his facial hair or tattoos? If the fire was hot enough to burn the metal of the car, how did his facial hair not burn? The hair would be the first thing to go in a fire. And his body would be so charred they would barely be able to see the tattoos. They would have to use dental records to identify him and that would have taken longer than the hour or two they identified him.
3. Why was the first person they called April Margera? Wouldn't they call Ryan's parents, then his girlfriend? And why would April Margera then immediately call TMZ and tell them that Ryan died in a car accident?
4. The car crash scene is weird too. In the left hand lane there are 4 tire marks, and those tire marks stop where Dunn's car supposedly crashed into the trees. Why would a car stop if they saw what happened, and not call the police? The tire tracks from Dunn's car look like they went straight into the guard rail with no sign of trying to turn at all. Like they wanted the car to go straight into the guard rail. Also, why would people be allowed to go into the crash site and take parts of the car? All parts of the car would be considered evidence, yet people are selling parts of the car on ebay.
5. When Bam got home, why did he go straight to the crash site and do immediate interviews? I know that if my best friend just died, the last thing I would want to do would go to the crash site and do an interview. The interview seemed insincere as well, because he did not shed a single tear.
6. A report is saying April played a major part in the gag, and I can believe that. Some people said that April hates they jokes, but in Jackass 3 and 3.5, she plays a part in most of the pranks. At one point in Jackass 3 or 3.5, when they glue Preston and Wee Man together, Bam asks "How are we going to pull them apart?" and you can clearly hear April saying, "Slide them across the table".
7. People are saying that the police and reporters wouldn't play along with that, but they have played along with all the Jackass starts pranks. In order to do their pranks, they have to tell the police. In Viva La Bam, payed a news reporter to go to April's work and tell her her house got blown up.
8. The news report on that was allegedly put up by Fox News looks pretty real to me. The article came out only an hour after news of his death was reported. I don't know how anyone could photoshop an article to look real like that. They even linked TMZ in the article.
9. In Bam's interview with E! news, they ask him what his last conversation with Dunn was. He then pulls out his cell phone and reads off his messages. Dunn is asking Bam if the "gate is unlocked" so he cam come over. The reporter asks him "When was this" and Bam says "Whenever the run was, Sunday". I thought Bam said he was in Arizona Sunday/Monday? Why would Dunn be asking to come over Sunday night is Bam is supposedly in Arizona?
10. Also, Dunn's BAC was allegedly .196. TMZ reported that his toxicology report would not be in until "4-6 weeks", yet the next day they said his BAC was .196. How could they find that out so fast? Also, they said he was going 130-140 mph. How would they be able to figure that out as well?
11. Also, why would Dunn post a picture of him pointing to a beer only hours before he crashed? There are reports that also say he stopped at a gas station to get food. Why would he drive safe all the whole time driving home, then gun it at the exit that was "30 seconds" from Zach Hartwell's home?
12. Also, how did they identify Zach Hartwell? Where are the proven records that they positively identified that Ryan Dunn and Zach Hartwell? They would need to identify both of them through dental records, but they haven't.
I'm not trying to be an asshole disrespectful so please don't be judgmental, I am just honestly confused at the details surrounding his death. And for those of you that say they wouldn't do something like this, this is the Jackass crew we are talking about.

Answer
You make some points that are good and some that make no sense, why he would go to the crash site? I would say for some closure. I had a friend killed in a wreck and I went to his crash site just days after also. Far as the marks going into the rail it looks like it control was lost and it went sideways. As far as trying to stir away, their is no way you would even have time to react at those speeds to steer away and if you didn it wouldn't make a difference, figure the night time no lights through that road and doing 130-140 and the car getting lose if he was trying to make the turn or dodge something. You mentioned why would he gun it 30 seconds from his house plenty of reasons when you got a car with speed you like to show it off, most people do anyways it was a nice straight stretch very long perfect place to show what the car has

as for the tats and such it was never said where he was burnt exactly face or what and seeing how he had tats on his arms chest and legs and the fact he had been previously arrested, they note any tats you have on your body, I'm sure not everybody in PA owns a porsche and they found the car door identified the car, then figuring out the 1 to 2 maybe 3 owners then checking the tats that was on the body that was possibly visible they prob just added 2 and 2 together, it was never said that he was still in the car or anything

I could see them doing the prank but I don't think they would invest the time it would take to do it all knowing they would prob get caught...tree limbs was broke..so they'd have to break limbs, cut big chunks of bark off the tree that you can see missing in videos of the crash site, f the guardrail up and the place where the car was suppose to burnt is right at a tree and all the way up the tree is black, so they'd have to do all this at night which would require lights in order to see not mention traffic going by and probably getting spotted and word being out by now about it...

Chevy Volt complainers - explain please...?

apeweek

If the Chevy Volt is indeed a dangerous, flammable car, why does the insurance industry rate it a "Top Safety Pick"?

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/tsp_archive.html

Why does the NHTSA, which discovered the 3-week delayed fire in a crashed Volt, say on their Volt page that the car has NOT been recalled? (They also rate it a perfect 5-stars for safety.)

http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shoppers/5-Star+Safety+Ratings/2011-Newer+Vehicles/Vehicle-Detail?vehicleId=232

Why does this page of recalled Chevy models - on a website that keeps track of recalled cars - not mention the Volt anywhere?

http://www.autorecalls.org/2011/CHEVROLET.shtml

Why, in this real world collision between a Volt and a Camry, is it the Camry that bursts into flame, and not the Volt?

http://www.hybridcars.com/news/chevy-volt-virtually-demolished-did-not-catch-fire-46583.html

Could some in the media have given us some false ideas about this car? What else that we've been told about the Volt might also be false?
Thanks everyone for the answers. However, I'm seeing almost nobody trying to answer the actual questions - why have we been told Volt is dangerous when the evidence points the other way?

Anybody care to really answer this?

Answer
I think we all know the answer to that...

"but Fox News said it was a death trap..."

just like the whole "the batteries being made are worse on the environment than a Hummer...OOPS WE FORGOT TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE BATTERY THAT'S IN THE HUMMER"

Powered by Yahoo! Answers