Is it justifiable to blow civilians up if they are against?

777

Loans to Libyan citizens are given with NO interest.
Students would get paid the average salary for the profession they are studying for.
If you are unable to get employment the state would pay the full salary as if you were employed until you find employment.
When you get married the couple gets an apartment or house for free from the Government.
You could go to college anywhere in the world. The state pays 2,500 euros plus accommodation and car allowance.
The cars are sold at factory cost.
Libya does not owe money, (not a cent) to anyone. No creditors.
Free education and health care for all citizens.
25% of the population with a university degree.
No beggars on the streets and nobody is homeless (until the recent bombing).
Bread costs only $0.15 per loaf

Seriously if you are against these free government benefits you deserve to have your ass killed off by the government. Why does the west justify the actions of these anarchist rebels?
Why does Obama get a Nobel Peace prize for supporting rebels and bombing a country that provides aid to thier citizens? Not to mention even in America our benefits will never compare to Libya's.
Desert Fox - Can you explain to me how free aid is "oppressive"?
You are a lame excuse for a "American" why should I move to another country? I love what this country stands for thats why I openly point out the truth and corruption and everything that was not American you really think our founding fathers found this country on the premise of destroy a country with superior benefits for its citizens? If anything you should get the hell out of this country because you blindly support bs that our country was not founded on.
Btw the highest tax bracket in Libya is only at 15% most of their countries benfits are paid for from thier oil income so can you please explain your bs conservative view of a foriegn country? How is a country opressive if they allow you to go to school and get a education ANY WHERE AROUND THE WORLD? SHEEp.

Answer
You are right, those who talk thrash about libya/gaddafi can't even find libya on map or tell the full name of Gaddafi.

Libya has no debt, and west owes over 200 billion to libya for the oil which they have already delivered. Gaddafi wasn't a dictator, he hold no political position forget about holding the highest one for the country, he was a revolutionary, freedom fighter, guide for the country.
Libya was officially direct democratic country, there you can raise your opinions/views in official assemblies, something that US can never ever touch when it comes to democracy..:-

http://gagnauga.is/index.php?Fl=Greinar&ID=169
http://thesantosrepublic.com/2011/10/purging-psyops-usa-murdered-gaddafi-and-the-legacy-of-libyas-great-leader/

Muammar Gaddafi was loved by his people and by whole world actually, don't mind the idiots who lies about him, fact is that he never committed any crime, each and every allegation which they had put have no proof or evidence, Admitted by US Pentagon, Amnesty International, Russian Intelligence, Libyan themselves, then why people still falsely believes that on the gossips?? Which are dead and outdated.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/amnesty-questions-claim-that-gaddafi-ordered-rape-as-weapon-of-war-2302037.html
http://rt.com/news/airstrikes-libya-russian-military/
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1110/S00144/un-silent-despite-no-basis-for-natos-illegal-war-on-libya.htm

Fact is that West had send Al-qaeda/wahhabis terrorists for killing people in Libya, when those terrorists were defeated/captured, the west illegally sent there forces with other 30+ countries and also forced other arab countries(Qatar, Jordan, UAE, etc) to send there forces too.

Why people say that there was protests against Gaddafi??? When it was just a fake revolution created by west in hollywood sets???? See:-

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zxlixI6jJEs
-------/watch?v=yHrwZK7jFZo
-------/watch?v=_KMJCNh5ZwM (fake victories)
-------/watch?v=lrYexlOFRC8
------/watch?v=vViUQnxfbJA (they shown india's protests as libya's)


They overthrow/killed Gaddafi for stealing the countries wealth(where's libya's billion now??), for resources(oil, agriculture, etc), for stealing gold(U.S. has no gold in there federal banks), and more reasons.
Nothing has been re-constructed in libya for over year now, because west and the acting puppet government only care about stealing and killing people. Now if you think that what are al-qaeda terrorists doing there? Well they are just killing anyone who is non retarded islamist and demolishing graves of all christians, jews.:-

http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/03/03/islamists-in-libya-destroy-graves-of-christians-and-jews/

Although Gaddafi's death is regarded to be fake by many and why not? No DNA/postmortem and secret burial... we all know how fake it is. National media of Libya, The former US department official Steve Pieczenik called the death fake too, it was done just for lowering the support of Gaddafi.. The actors who acted in that video were never seen before or after the video, it was shoot 1 day before it's release and that time it was raining in the city..
In real the Gaddafi's loyalists still control most of the country, once they get the whole capital city back, they are back, they have re-taken a few areas as well so that country can be free from terrorists.. Sources:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7yCYamrMzo
http://coupmedia.org/middle-east-unrest/libyan-media-say-muammar-gaddafi-is-still-alive-2010
http://libyasos.blogspot.in/2011/10/muammar-al-gaddafi-is-alive.html

Are democrats proving themselves to be unthinking drones when they ignore facts like this?

holeymoley

Common sense tells everyone but liberals and democrats that ALL human predators dearly hope their targets are unarmed, whether the predator is a home invader, Stalin or Hitler:
-Thomas Jefferson, "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776: ââLaws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."

Even pacifists like Mahatma Gandhi "got it," saying: "Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." An Autobiography, pg 446.

But liberals and democrats always religiously cling to their dogmatic faith that âmore guns leads to more crimeâ no matter how much evidence you shove in their face, including:

-9/27/01 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/156671⦠are deeply rooted within Swiss culture but the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept"; âIn addition to the government-provided arms, there are few restrictions on buying weapons.â

-1/15/03 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/26568⦠BBC: "âIf guns are outlawed only outlaws will have gunsâ" may prove prophetic. Gun crime in the UK is soaring even though it has the strictest gun control laws of any democracy.â
Nine years later: 12/17/12 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-⦠UKâs violent crime rate per 100,000 people is 2,034; USâs is 466.

-2/2/11 Daily Telegraph, about piracy: âThe safest ships of all [sailing in the Gulf of Aden] are flying the Russian flag: armed guards aboard them simply blow pirate boats out of the water and leave any survivors to drown. Attacks on Russian vessels have abruptly ceased.â

-7/25/12 http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-07-⦠1950 all but one mass-murders in the U. S. where more than three people died were committed in gun-free zones. The Gun-Free Schools Zone Act was passed in 1990.

-9/25/12 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/5c1b6a72-c5eb-â¦
âBut almost 30 years after the law [which mandates that all households own at least one firearm for self-protection] was passed, it is still in place and still popular, not least because Kennesawâs crime rate has remained disproportionately low, even as the townâs population swelled from 5,000 in 1982 to almost 35,000 now. According to the latest FBI statistics, Kennesaw recorded 31 violent crimes â mainly robberies and aggravated assaults â during 2008. In other similar-sized local towns the figures were much higher â 127 in Dalton and 188 in Hinesville. For property crimes â largely burglaries and thefts â Kennesaw recorded 555 while Dalton had 1,124 and Hinesville 1,802.â

-11/23/12 http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/local/⦠2006-2011 gun purchases in Virginia increased 73%. During the same period gun-related crimes fell 24%.

-1/6/13 http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/20â¦According to Bureau of Justice Statistics, the firearm crime rate dropped from 6 victims per 1,000 residents in 1994 to 1.4 victims per 1,000 residents in 2009. This has occurred as more and more citizens have armed themselves under right-to-carry State laws. While major crimes show continuing decline in those States, this phenomenon parallels a major crime rise in heavily gun-controlled cities.

-In 1950 there were 40 million cars in the USA. In 2009 there were 260 million, over six times more. And yet car deaths are the lowest since 1950: 9/9/10 http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/09/autos/nhtsa_traffic_deaths/index.htm: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Traffic deaths have hit their lowest level since 1950, the year fatalities behind the wheel began to be tracked, according to the latest government statistics.

The reason for the decline is obvious to all sentient Americans: laws regarding safer construction and the operation of cars were strictly enforced.

But look at how democrats willfully ignore current gun laws:

2/4/11 http://www.minnpost.com/community-voices/2011/02/first-order-business-enforce-existing-federal-gun-lawsAccording to U.S. Department of Justice data, only 2 percent of federal gun crimes were actually prosecuted, and 85 percent of those cases were crimes of possession. That means the people illegally selling or transporting guns are almost never being charged under the firearms statutes.

Answer
Where do these people on here get the idea americans what to be disarmed? These stats from a survey say the opposite. Quit believing the media and political hype it is false and trying to convince you it is the peoples choice. America is not for the reduction of its right to own!

Nice facts to bad those that are anti gun will never admit it or believe it. But add these stats to yours and the truth is obvious!


Should the federal government regulate guns of any type?
________________________________________
Yes, it should
276,581(28%)

No, it should not
691,108(71%)

Should Congress ban semi-automatic weapons?
________________________________________
Yes, it should
220,496(22%)

No, it should not
753,821(77%)

If Congress does not act, should President Obama use an executive order to ban or strictly control the sale of semi-automatic weapons?
________________________________________
Yes, he should
200,414(20%)

No, he should not
772,614(79%)

Do you agree that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own and bear guns without infringement?
________________________________________
Yes, I agree
790,712(81%)

No, I don't agree
182,982(18%)

Powered by Yahoo! Answers