car hauling news image
Starship P
I heard they had to call in extra squad cars to haul them all in. Selling everything from bootleg designer purses to human kidneys.
Kind of not surprising they all were democrats is it?
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-new-jersey-corruption24-2009jul24,0,6132871.story?track=rss
Answer
None!
This was all a case of constant and forever and ever racial profiling!
That is, if any of them were black.
Any that weren't black .... they guilty as hell!
Obama will apologize later tonight.
None!
This was all a case of constant and forever and ever racial profiling!
That is, if any of them were black.
Any that weren't black .... they guilty as hell!
Obama will apologize later tonight.
What you be in support of this action against the American car companies?
Saucy
I propose to let the automakers fail but to an extent. I would put a congressional chairperson to oversee every action each car company does with the new bailout money. And impose strict guidelines in terms of emissions like California on the new vehicles made.
--OR--
Let the automakers fail and instead inject money directly into all the other smaller car companies that are much more focused on fuel efficient cars like Telsa and a few others. This would create a new auto market where instead of a few companies owning the industry, there would be dozens which could possibly spur more manufacturing jobs and more competition in the long haul. The big 3 would still exist but would be restructed most likely under bankruptcy claims.
Thoughts? Suggestions? What you think?
The only problem with both letting them fail and giving them money is what will happen to the 2.1 million people who are employed by them?
Answer
I have another option. Let them be responsible for their actions just like any other business. They can choose to file for bankruptcy (this will not mean that they will close). Then they can restructure and since their contracts with the unions would be canceled by the bankruptcy, they could renegotiate a more reasonable agreement.
Even if GM were to go under, life will go on. Other car companies will experience a rise in sales. A new car company could emerge---one with good efficiency and management---and who makes a quality product that people will want to buy. The displaced workers will survive. I live in a city where we've lost several GM plants in the last decade. Life goes on. Some workers retire, some train to work in other fields (their severance includes free schooling), others choose to work in other manufacturing plants. The severance for these unskilled employees is extremely generous. If they've worked at GM for over 10 years, they get $140,000.00 each---which in this area is more than the average price of a home.
http://www.whiotv.com/news/17754270/detail.html
We've lost 1,000's of GM jobs and life has went on. Yes, the local economy has taken a hit but it's not devastated. If we have to reward any business with government money (which I'm against doing), I'd rather reward the successful ones. I've seen the business practices of GM and I DON"T want to be forced to invest in them through taxation.
I have another option. Let them be responsible for their actions just like any other business. They can choose to file for bankruptcy (this will not mean that they will close). Then they can restructure and since their contracts with the unions would be canceled by the bankruptcy, they could renegotiate a more reasonable agreement.
Even if GM were to go under, life will go on. Other car companies will experience a rise in sales. A new car company could emerge---one with good efficiency and management---and who makes a quality product that people will want to buy. The displaced workers will survive. I live in a city where we've lost several GM plants in the last decade. Life goes on. Some workers retire, some train to work in other fields (their severance includes free schooling), others choose to work in other manufacturing plants. The severance for these unskilled employees is extremely generous. If they've worked at GM for over 10 years, they get $140,000.00 each---which in this area is more than the average price of a home.
http://www.whiotv.com/news/17754270/detail.html
We've lost 1,000's of GM jobs and life has went on. Yes, the local economy has taken a hit but it's not devastated. If we have to reward any business with government money (which I'm against doing), I'd rather reward the successful ones. I've seen the business practices of GM and I DON"T want to be forced to invest in them through taxation.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment