channel 5 news car crash image
Give Me Li
Liberals will actually take the time to block Fox News from their cable or satellite channels. Why? Is an opposing view so offensive that it must be shunned even at the cost of more choice? Why wouldnât a liberal want to know what the other point of view is? How can you learn and grow if you refuse to allow your points of view to be challenged?
Liberals will tell you Wallstreet is ruining America. Then quote Wallstreet elite when they are trying to convince you the stimulous is working. A liberal regime will hire Wallstreet elite to control the treasury. Wallstreet and government are so intertwined it is difficult to untangle the mess they have made. If âChange you can believe inâ¦â meant more Wallstreet control of government â Obama kept that promise. If Wallstreet is ruining America, why would a liberal government integrate them further into positions of vast power?
Do liberals really want an improved standard of living for all Americans? The answer here can only be: âNoâ. Any rational look at the wealth of nations and standards of living will clearly demonstrate less government builds wealth for all. Liberals should be clear â they want equality over actual quality. Yes, we can all live a somewhat economically equal existance, but it will be a low standard. The upper middle class in the Soviet Union was allowed a 2 bedroom apartment and public transportation. The lower middle class in America has 3 bedrooms and 2 cars! Yes, the super rich would live a lifestyle far in excess of the lowest rungs. However, even the lowest rungs will have food, shelter, and most importantly: the opportunity to succeed.
Liberals seem to spit in the face of logic when it comes to results. Obama set expectations for what the stimulous would do and not do. Unemployment was not supposed to go over 8% if we approved the stimulous. Unemployment has exceeded 8% even using the ridiculously understated US Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers. Most economists examing the data are arriving at figures 50% higher. So what is the logical solution? Itâs obvious to rational people that the stimulous did not deliver as promised, try the opposite â give the money back to the people. For liberals, the answer is âmore of the sameâ.
Liberals claim to value science. This might be news to liberals, but science and science fiction are two different things. Science is a rigorous system of observation, testing, data analysis, and finally a conclusion. How would that system apply to government? Easy â reduce federal power. Allow the states to test theories of government within their borders. Winners and losers will quickly stand out. Testing aggressive government programs by forcing the entire nation to adopt them is insanity, not science. Dispite the massive consolidation of power, we do have some examples among the states that stand out. Oregon has the highest unemployment in the nation â so should we copy what they are doing? Liberals say âYes!â Oregon has the highest minimum wage, the federal government is going to force that wage on all of the states. If liberals have decided to use science to destroy America, they are on the right track. Recklessly experimenting on the entire population is a recipe for disaster. Choosing the worst examples and emulating their programs nationwide seems to indicate a desire to create negative results.
Why do liberals think this way?
Note to republicans: Donât consider this post an endorsement. After all, it was you idiots that screwed things up so bad that America thought voting in liberals was a rational idea.
@Durango: I am a complete libertarian... so calling this post "conservative propaganda" makes you seem very foolish.
Answer
1. Fox news is like coke claiming to be healthy and quenches your thirst.
2. WallStreet was responsible for the crash hence they are ruining AMerica! They help created futures and other trading schemes that do not help normal Americans.
3. Liberals will try to help everyone increase the standard of living to a certain extent. Now just the wealthy pay one of the lowest tax rates since the Eisenhower era perhaps they should tax ed like the middle class.
4. Historically spending is what takes a country out of a recession. Obama had too much hope but and could not comprehend the extent of Bush's recession. ( imagine that you are only looking at the tip of the iceberge.
5. Speaking of science why are you talking about Oregon? Why would a worldwide recession not affect Oregon? You can reduce government anytime during the Boom years .
1. Fox news is like coke claiming to be healthy and quenches your thirst.
2. WallStreet was responsible for the crash hence they are ruining AMerica! They help created futures and other trading schemes that do not help normal Americans.
3. Liberals will try to help everyone increase the standard of living to a certain extent. Now just the wealthy pay one of the lowest tax rates since the Eisenhower era perhaps they should tax ed like the middle class.
4. Historically spending is what takes a country out of a recession. Obama had too much hope but and could not comprehend the extent of Bush's recession. ( imagine that you are only looking at the tip of the iceberge.
5. Speaking of science why are you talking about Oregon? Why would a worldwide recession not affect Oregon? You can reduce government anytime during the Boom years .
question about my characters death - UK laws?
Maddi
My character, who is a police officer.
She was on a police chase and killed in the chase. Everyone from the car she, and her colleague, died.
Im telling the story from her husbands perspective so need these questions answering to fit with the UK law.
What would happen, legally, afterwards?
Would there be a trail, even though the other characters died?
When would the characters body be released?
What there be support to the characters husband, maybe in the form of a family laiason officer?
How long would the husband be entitled to have time off work after her death?
And what are the rules with death certificates?
As she was his wife, would he have to do anything to end the marriage so that he can remarry later on in life? (which i am intending for the character at the end)
Also, what injuries would kill the character instantly? I don't want her surviving for any amount of time after the crash as i dont know enough medical things to write about all that.
i know that it's a huge question but i think it is a very good plot and i would love to write something other than romance and horror.
thanks for any help in advance
I'm from the UK - England
Answer
when someone dies a family member, or failing that, has to register the death.
the best thing to do is to google each separate thing- eg- register a death-
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Death/WhatToDoAfterADeath/DG_10029642
one is usually entitled to 2 wekes of work following a death, but it can be extended- you'd need a doctor's note.
the police do look after their own, and three would prob be a family liason officer- shouldhre husband want to have one- an interesting plot point- since the officer may well know both of the dead coppers, the husband may not want to have to speak to someone.
think about what happens on csi and on the news- you know all this;- there is a 'trail' if there have been witnesses- electronic- satnav, cctv, or human- eye witnessness, phone/radio conversation at the time.
they may also haev atracking device in the car. phones give out a signal.
if they died in a rural area, it'd be different.
high speed chases are often accompanied by helecopters, which film the entire thing- there are countless late night crappy shows- eg- nightwatch- showing just this on itv and channel 5.
if you want to know about method of death- google car crash, died instantly, etc. people are even killed by air bags- you can do some really gruesome research.
her body would be released by the coroner when they had finished with it- ie following the post mortem (called autopsy in the US)- i have particually enjoyed the work of the coroners in inspector morse and lewis- get them out on dvd.
you can find out most of this by googling, and it'd throw up loads more ideas. watch lewis and morse anyway- great tv series.
when someone dies a family member, or failing that, has to register the death.
the best thing to do is to google each separate thing- eg- register a death-
http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Death/WhatToDoAfterADeath/DG_10029642
one is usually entitled to 2 wekes of work following a death, but it can be extended- you'd need a doctor's note.
the police do look after their own, and three would prob be a family liason officer- shouldhre husband want to have one- an interesting plot point- since the officer may well know both of the dead coppers, the husband may not want to have to speak to someone.
think about what happens on csi and on the news- you know all this;- there is a 'trail' if there have been witnesses- electronic- satnav, cctv, or human- eye witnessness, phone/radio conversation at the time.
they may also haev atracking device in the car. phones give out a signal.
if they died in a rural area, it'd be different.
high speed chases are often accompanied by helecopters, which film the entire thing- there are countless late night crappy shows- eg- nightwatch- showing just this on itv and channel 5.
if you want to know about method of death- google car crash, died instantly, etc. people are even killed by air bags- you can do some really gruesome research.
her body would be released by the coroner when they had finished with it- ie following the post mortem (called autopsy in the US)- i have particually enjoyed the work of the coroners in inspector morse and lewis- get them out on dvd.
you can find out most of this by googling, and it'd throw up loads more ideas. watch lewis and morse anyway- great tv series.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment